If you want to see comically
bad and grandiose amateur theater, go to amateur theater. Somewhere
near you, awful drama is happening this week. I don't mean the
kid bawling like a baby because cops just found fifteen bucks
of crystal meth in his underwear and they're going to tell his
parents. And I don't mean the drunk guy behind the Tavern, kicking
the waste-oil bin and howling with rage because victory at tabletop
shuffleboard was snatched from his grasp when Worm and his new
girlfriend bumped him while tongue-wrestling to a Charlie Daniels
Band track on the jukebox.
Actually, the guy in the alley isn't a bad actor;
he's a tableau of handsome, powerful anger, untapped in a ravishing
display of manhood. Can I tell you a secret? That man was me.
God, did I look good. Except for when my foot got soaked in
semi-gelled fat.
I'm talking about teenagers doing "A Funny Thing
Happened on the Way to the Forum" or middle-aged hacks hamming
their way through "Murder's a Bitch", in a murder-mystery dinner
theater. You want to laugh so hard you piss not only your pants
but those of the person sitting next to you? You should see
the production of "Hair" at the Arvada Eggs and Bards breakfast
theater. All-you-can-eat scrambled eggs and hash browns, served
by writhing hippies singing "Aquarius". I like the restaurant's
slogan, though: "Why not get your theater out of the way early?"
My point is, you don't need to look very far
to see comically bad theater. And when you want to see it, why
not support local, comically bad amateurs? Still, professional--and
sometimes decent--actors, writers and directors find bad theater
too wide a target to miss. There are some pretty funny examples,
especially SCTV's "I'm Taking My Own Head, Screwing it
on Right, and No Guy's Gonna Tell me That it Ain't" starring
Libby Wolfson and Sue "Bopper" Simpson, Waiting for Guffman
with Christopher Guest, Eugene Levy and Catherine O'Hara and
"Streetcar" on The Simpson's. There are grandiose interpretations
of amateur theater, like Rushmore, which is pretty damn
funny. Mostly, though, the parodies are crap, and mostly on
the Disney Channel. Although, I can't say for sure whether that
shit is supposed to be a parody. It's the work of people who
actually aren't much more talented than the amateurs they're
mocking.
Hamlet 2 falls into the crap category.
It's a shapeless, weirdly unmoving and unfunny mess of that
lampoons sappy inspriational-teacher movies while slavishly
following their blueprint and plot points. It tries to get cheap
laughs out of overblown high school plays, while redeeming its
characters through the same, and trying to convince it transcends
the same shit we're supposed to laugh at.
I was looking forward to this movie, because
the star Steve Coogan can be pretty fucking funny. And clever,
like in Tristram
Shandy: a Cock and Bull Story. He created a few characters
in the UK that were profoundly funny, pathetic and sympathetic.
He's going for the same thing here as a Tucson drama teacher
who is going to be out of a job unless he raises enough money
with his next play to save the program. He is a terrible actor,
but a somewhat passionate teacher who wants to pass on the little
he knows, and produce his play versions of popular movies. Faced
with losing his job and the scathing reviews from his school
paper's critic, he goes out on a limb and writes his first new
material, Hamlet 2.
In Coogan's play, Hamlet comes back from the
dead through a time machine, as do Ophelia, Gertrude and the
rest of the sad-sack Danes. For some reason, Jesus is along
for the ride, too. Hamlet 2 is a musical, of course,
with jokey songs, like "Rock Me, Sexy Jesus". With the Savior
signed up for action, you're guaranteed some jokes that are
meant to be outrageous by invoking the name rather than by being
funny. Of course, this is Hollywood shit, so it isn't actually
blasphemous (or clever), just timidly controversial. I would
bet the makers were hoping to God they would get the press coverage
of a Christian boycott.
Throughout Hamlet 2, I waited and waited
for the story to resolve all its lame hoodlums-get-inspired
plot devices and finally reveal the big play. I thought maybe
then it would get funny. But by the time of the show, so much
diarrhea has gone under bridge that I just didn't give a monkey's
right nut.
The biggest problem is Coogan's totally bewildering
and sappy performance. The man likes to gives his characters
pathos, but this is an unshaped mess. At all times, he's a 50-Watt
dimbulb, and I mean in intelligence and energy. Most of the
time, he's doing stupid shit that's supposed to be funny, like
riding on rollerskates in his tweed jacket. But Coogan undermines
the comedy by making his teacher sad and low-key. And he burdens
the character with so much emotional baggage it's pretty easy
to forget he's supposed to be funny. He's a recovering alcoholic
who, of course, goes off the wagon, There aren't any big laughs
in that, and it's dropped as quickly as it's brought up. His
wife (Catherine Keener - criminally underused - she's fucking
hot) gets impregnated by a boarder in their house and leaves
Coogan for him. But nothing leads up to this and the consequence
is just to make Coogan sadder, not funnier. Also, Coogan apparently
has some father issue that are never explored; it just pops
up and is meant to explain him. This shit is meant to add gravity,
but who the fuck needs gravity in a movie about a bad high school
drama teacher staging a sequel to Hamlet? Coogan would
have been way funnier playing broader and with a stronger backbone.
At the beginning
of the movie, Coogan cites several cheesy hoodlums-inspired-by-teachers
movies to his class. It could be a setup for a subversive take
on the genre. That maybe not all teachers are inspiring; some
fuckup kids forever. Instead, the plot of Hamlet 2 is
identical to their plots. The kids think he's a dork at the
beginning. By the end, they give their all to defend him and
make his dream come true. They've been transformed from thugs
to sensitive, inspired thespians, and the toughest boy and the
softest girl find enough in common to lick each other's faces.
Maybe this is meant to be satire of inspirational teacher flicks,
but shit, if it is, it's done so badly I missed the joke.
The climactic theater production is just painful.
There are a couple funny things in the staging of Hamlet
2, but the jokes are primarily based on the premise that
we'll think we're so fucking cool not being offended by its
faux outrageousness. It's a crappy play, filled with awful acting
and a stupid, obvious story, but all that somehow stops being
a joke. Instead, the crowd goes nuts and loves it. In the end,
not only is this drunki, stupid loser redeemed, he goes to Broadway
becomes a celebrity. Seriously. This ending is easy and unfunny,
plus it doesn't resolve all the sappy "issues" Coogan's teacher
has. Instead, it plays into the simplistic Hollywood bullshit
that wealth and fame are the solution for everything. Without
even smirking.
This movie would have been way fucking funnier
if the play tanked like it should have, and Coogan was sent
into a spiral of shame and booze that he could never pull out
of, or if he did it was by being so drunk he reached celebrity
status (although, mayb eI am projecting my own wishes here).
Sadly, director/writer Andrew Fleming doesn't have the imagination
or balls to do anything unconventional or genuinely contrversial.
So, a crappy story ends crappily, and Steve Coogan shoots himself
in the balls in trying to become an American movie star. Two
Fingers for Hamlet 2.
Want
to tell Filthy Something?